Fighting Cancer
Fred was diagnosed with prostate cancer a few months ago. There was also a spot on his liver the size of 'two peanuts'. The PSA was very high. He was put on the hormone inhibitor flutamide, but no other treatment was offered. The situation was much too far advanced. Surgery, he was told, would be a waste of Fred's money and the doctor's time. In three months he would be dead. Fred and his wife live in New Brunswick. The two of them made a trip to Seattle to visit his sister. While there, they heard about my friend, a nutritionist/herbalist/muscle-tester we will call 'Ann'. Might as well go visit Ann, there was very little to lose at this point. As they sat in Ann's office, Fred's wife felt that they were wasting their time. 'We know he is going to die.' Ann replied that there was a good chance that he would make it. The treatment involved three electronic devices. The first was a PFG-100 Rife-Crane paddle type machine. A Beck blood electrifier was to be used on wrist pulse points one hour each day. After each such treatment, he was to use a Magnetic Pulser on each lymph node. Fred was also told to sit on the negative face of a large flat magnet for at least twenty minutes twice each day. It was felt that this afforded the nearest point to the prostate. Nutritional support consisted of just two items from Oxygen For Life: Liquid minerals and liquid shark cartilage. Five weeks later, Fred was back in New Brunswick. He went back to his oncologist for the appropriate tests and scans. All were normal and he was pronounced free of cancer. The doctor said that in several thousand cases, he had not seen any cases of cancer just go away like that. As I write this (February 2, 1997), Fred is satisfied with the outcome. Bob Beck: "Recently, Jane and I were invited to the largest alternative cancer clinic in the western hemisphere. The man in charge of the clinic told me that 87% of their terminal, not mid-stage, cancer patients, who had been given up for dead, are now healed! They have scar tissue where once they had lesions; they have clean biopsies. They are up, they are back at work. Those patients used the technology we are discussing today (blood electrification). I was given terminal cancer patients by the largest and best-known hospital in California. After 12 of them were healed, some of them ended up committing suicide because we had taken their crutches away from them. We will say that this technology will not overcome a person's death wish. That is an issue we have to find an answer for and have not yet found, but we will."  The idea behind both of these 'treatments' is to kill the group of cancerous cells, but is that the most intelligent approach? It doesn't address the cause of cancer which is a combination of toxins and cancer-causing viruses. So even if they are successful at killing the tumor, they still haven't addressed the cause, and then another tumor just materializes and the whole stupid cycle just repeats itself at great cost ($ and pain) to you. They'll be cutting and drugging and radiating you until the day you die because you haven't addressed the cause. Is that what you want? The current and long-standing 3% long-term survival rate of cancer patients using orthodox therapies remains abysmal and the statistical reportage is obfuscated. Refer to : New England Journal of Medicine, 'Progress Against Cancer,' May 8, 1986 by John C. Bailar, III and Elaine M. Smith, and a ten-year follow-up 'The War on Cancer' which appeared in Lancet, May 18th, 1996, by Michael B. Spoorn. In 'Health United States', an annual publication by the federal government, our national death rate from cancer is approximately 2,500,000 people per year and the rate is rising. In addition to the trauma and suffering to the patients and their families and the productive work force, it comes with a hefty price tag. Assuming a cost of $80,000 to $160,000 per person over the last 20 years, that figure represents $200,000,000 to $370,000,000 per year and 50,000,000 lives, or $4 TRILLION to $7.5 TRILLION dollars funneled from our collective economy into the hands of the medical pharmaceutical cartel. Is it any wonder, then, why they cannot find a cure? To read about Doctor Kelley's claim that the US medical system is suppressing knowledge of various alternative means of curing cancer go to http://www.rarebooks.net/beck/, click NEWS, then click 'Cancer Cure Suppressed'. For books on the subject click here. First off, radiation itself damages the DNA in cells which makes them cancerous because the definition of a cancerous cell is a normal body cell that no longer reproduces itself to be a normal cell with its assigned function of service in the body. When the DNA is damaged then the cell reproduces itself abnormally and then the cell usually loses its normal function and then is only self-serving instead of contributing to the body by carrying out its God given function. Radiation therapy can kill cancer cells if strong enough, but at the same time cause more cells in the path of the radiation to become cancerous. Click here to read evidence of higher incidences of cancer as a result of a greater number of Xrays received from doctors taking their deadly snapshots. Secondly, chemotherapy is equally toxic to all your normal cells as well as the cancerous ones, and it is especially damaging to your immune system which is the only thing that can remove the cancerous cells from your body. You probably have cancer because your immune system is weak anyway, and now you want to injure it more? You need to strengthen the immunity, not weaken it. In 1987 Dr. Lana Levi, of the University of California wrote, “Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy... It does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancer. This fact has been know for over a decade.. Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemotherapy than without it.” There are no statistics that show that radiation and chemotherapy are successful against cancer. period. If a doctor says there are then just walk out on him because he is either lying to you or has believed the propaganda that the medical system has fed him. Some people get over a cancerous episode in spite of their conventional treatments, not because of them. They totally don't make sense and they are against nature. Nature wants you to aid it in removing toxins and cancer-causing viruses and boost its immune system so you can get rid of cancer. The perverted medical system wants you to spend all your hard earned money on their counter-productive anti-nature stupid treatments so that they can stay on the gravy train. You may not know this but the world is controlled by rich people who only want more riches and want to continue their underhanded methods of population control so that there will always be enough space and resources for them to enjoy. The world isn't controlled by governments or social systems. They are merely puppets. You are only a sheep for the slaughter until you wake up and claim your independence. Every time an alternative healer starts having success against cancer and AIDS then the FDA imprisons them or runs them out of the country. The FDA is the strong arm of the drug companies which are owned by those greedy rich people I mentioned. People, wake up and smell the shit! It's all around you! Did you know that cancer is an infectious epidemic? Read below to find out how the polio vaccine was contaminated by a cancer causing virus and how the government let it pass although they knew about it. Also there is much evidence that the AIDS virus was a genetically altered monkey virus. Sheep for the slaughter. That's all you are till you start to think for yourself and divorce yourself from the demonic world system that only considers you an economic digit. Cancer Virus in Polio Vaccine I have read an extremely interesting book called "Mary, Ferrie, and the Cancer Virus" which is a first hand account of how the author found out that the cancer epidemic we are in right now was caused by the polio vaccines which were tainted with cancer-causing monkey viruses which the government found out about and thus secretly tried like hell to come up with a vaccine, but unsuccessfully. Instead they may have inadvertently created the AIDS virus because they were experimenting with haphazardly changing the DNA of monkey viruses (which is the closest type of virus that the AIDS virus is). Well worth reading and told in an interesting way. To order send $20 to Wordsworth, P O Box 20202, Albuquerque NM 87154.
Quote from the book: "Today, however, there is copious evidence of a variety of simian (monkey) viruses found in the tissue of sick humans. Of particular concern is the DNA from SV-40 (simian virus #40) repeatedly extracted from several types of tumors, including brain, bone, and previously rare chest cancers." In the words of former FDA virologist John Martin, M.D., Ph.D., "SV-40 infection is now widespread within the human population almost certainly as a result of a polio vaccine." SKIN CANCER Scientists from the ICRF have found that up to 50 per cent of immunosuppressed kidney transplant patients develop skin tumours and all of them are indeed with a new human papilloma virus. They believe the virus may predispose cells to being damaged by UV sun rays. CERVICAL CANCER Women with cervical cancer have been found to lack antibodies to a protein (E2) produced by H.P.Virus type 16 which is found in 95% of cervical tumours. Their immune system thus does not recognize HPV-infected cells as foreign. Smoking, which increases the risk of cervical cancer is also thought to reduce immune system ability to eliminate HPV. US researchers have launched human trials of an HPV vaccine. LEUKEMIA The Institute of Public Health in Cambridge reported last month that Lymphocytic leukemia - the commonest type of cancer in children - could be caused by a seasonal virus. After studying 4,000 cases, they found people were 40 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with the condition between May and October. Multiple Validation that Cancer is caused by a Virus from http://www.htc.net/~trumans/indexg.html : Rife was not the only researcher to find a microbial cause for cancer. Many others have also. Nor was Rife the only one to build an optical microscope that could see the BX cancer virus. Currently in Canada the biologist Gaston Naessens uses an ultraviolet microscope which can easily view the BX cancer virus in living blood from cancer patients. Naessens' microscope uses an ultraviolet light source which is first polarized, then focused down and sent through a frequency doubler crystal and finally sent into a special condenser section for dark field microscopy. Looking at live blood from cancer patients, Naessens has found and made videos of at least sixteen different forms the BX cancer virus can be transformed into. I have viewed some of these videos and the antimated ( motile ) BX and BY cancer viruses are clearly visible and look just as Rife described them. As for the other researchers who have found the same microbial cause for cancer as Rife, they have all been persecuted, while their work has been maligned and discredited by the corrupt higher ruling circles of what currently passes for legitimate medicine and microbiology. Perhaps a brief review of the work of one victim is in order. Dr. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler in 1947 while studying tumors found the same organism in all of them. Her findings were published in August 1948 by the New York Microscopical Society Bullitin. Later in Dec 1950 Wheeler had an article published in the American Journal of Medical Sciences on microbe cultures taken from both human and animal tumors. On Sept 10, 1953 the Washington Post reported the discoveries of Dr. Wheeler and her team from Rutgers-Presbyterian Hospital Laboratory which were disclosed at the 6th International Congress of Microbiology in Rome. They had found conclusive proof of a microbial cause for cancer. When Dr. Wheeler and her group returned from Rome to Rutgers-Presbyterian Hospital they found that the funds for their laboratory were being cut off. The laboratory was closed. This was the behind- the-scenes work and doings of Dr. Corneluis P. Rhoads, the head of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The fear of the cancer industry elite is and was immense. If the truth about the true cause of cancer becomes known then a cheap cure will be found shortly thereafter. This will kill the cancer goose which lays tens of billions of dollars worth of eggs a year. The San Diego Union of July 31, 1949 reported on the work of Dr. Gruner of McGill University, Montreal, Canada and Dr. J.E. Hett of Windsor, Canada. They were in agreement with and had experimental proof that Dr. Royal Raymond Rife's discovery that cancer was caused by a microbe was correct. In 1950 Dr. James Hillman of RCA Labs in Princeton, N.J. found the BX cancer virus using an electron microscope. Great cancer info from the book 'The Body Electric' by Robert Becker available from amazon.com: "Three basic criteria by which a doctor diagnoses cancer must serve as the starting point in solving the mystery of the cause of cancer. First of all, the disease always arises from a formerly normal cell, and the cancer cells are more primitive than their healthy precursors. Moreover, this atavism reflects the seriousness of the disease: The simpler the cells, the faster they grow and the harder they are to treat, whereas a tumor that still resembles its tissue of origin is less malignant. The second criterion is growth rate. Cancer cells multiply wildly, in contrast to the slow, carefully controlled mitosis (cell division) of normal cells. Going hand in hand with this uncontrolled proliferation is a similar lack of control in the structural arrangement of the cells. Their membranes don’t line up in the normal, specific ways, and they form a jumbled mass instead of useful architecture. As a further result of runaway multiplication, cancer doesn’t observe the ‘boundary laws’ of normal tissue. Instead it encroaches imperialistically upon its neighbors. In addition, since the cells don’t adhere in any kind of structure, some of them are constantly breaking off, flowing through the blood and lymph, and setting up colonies -- metastases -- throughout the body. The third basic criterion of cancer is metabolic priority. The diseased tissue greedily takes first choice of all nutrients circulating in the blood; the healthy part of the body gets what’s left over. As the tumors disseminate and grow, they consume all available food, and the host wastes away and dies. We can make one crucial observation at this point: Except for the lack of control, all three characteristics -- cell simplicity, cell division speed, and metabolic priority -- are hallmarks of two normal conditions, embryonic growth and regeneration. (an embryo is the beginning of a baby) When considering the similarities between an embryo and a tumor, it's important to keep in mind one difference. Even though contained within the body of its mother, the embryo is a complete organism, and the controls over its cells are primarily its own, not those of an adult. Over thirty years ago in Switzerland, G. Andres probed this relationship by implanting frog embryos in various body tissues of adult frogs. Whenever the host didn't simply reject the graft, the embryo degenerated into a highly malignant metastasizing tumor. As a result, Andres proposed a theory of cancer that remains provocative today: A normal cell becomes cancerous by dedifferentiation. (a cell that differentiates is one that has a specific structure and purpose different than others. one that de-differentiates is one that loses its individuality and has no purpose other than eat and divide itself.) This change is not dangerous per se, according to Andes, but, because it occurs in an animal matured past being a fetus in its mothers womb, the controls that would normally hold these neo-embryonic cells in check aren't working. Cancer's relationship to regeneration is even more interesting. In cellular regeneration, a rapid growth of primitive cells having metabolic priority occurs in an adult, but with proper control as in an embryo. Those animals that regenerate best are least susceptible to cancer. In general, as complexity increases up the evolutionary ladder from worms to humans, regeneration decreases and cancer becomes more common. Although salamanders stand about midway in degree of complexity, they're perhaps the least specialized of all land vertebrates. They have tremendous regenerative capability and have almost no occurrence of cancer. Even to give them tumors in the laboratory requires much effort. Adult frogs, on the other hand, have bodies that are much more specialized for their amphibious way of life; they regenerate very little and are subject to several kinds of cancer. In 1948 Meryl Rose decided to see whether the environment of a salamander’s regenerating limb could control the primitive cells of cancer as well as those of the new cells forming to recreate the limb. He took pieces of a type of kidney tumor common in frogs and transplanted them to the whole limbs of salamanders. These tumors took better than most, and soon killed the animals when allowed to spread unchecked. However, when Rose amputated the leg just below or through the malignancy, normal regeneration followed, and the cancer cells dedifferentiated even more fully as the new limb formed. Then as the new leg grew, the former frog tumor cells redifferentiated along with the new limb cells. The frog cells were easily distinguished from salamander cells by their smaller nuclei (center sphere of a cell), and the microscopic study showed frog muscle mixed in with salamander muscle, frog cartilage cells amid salamander cartilage, and so on. This monumentally important experiment proved Rose's hypothesis that regeneration's guidance system could control cancer, too. It implied that cancer cells weren't special but merely embryonic cells in a post-embryonic body. Rose's work led directly to Andres's theory a few years later. Unfortunately, biology was still firmly gripped by anti-dedifferentiationism, and these ideas were partly ridiculed, partly ignored. The reaction held back cancer research for decades, because the dogma implied that carcinogenesis was irreversible -- once a cancer cell, always a cancer cell. As long as this view was sacred, the only way to cure cancer was to cut it out or kill it with drugs and X rays. We've been beating that dead horse for fifty years now with tragically modest increases in survival rates. Surgery works only against tumors that haven’t yet spread. Chemotherapy depends on differences between malignant and healthy cells. However, the differences aren't as great as we would like, because cancer arises, not in some distant swamp, but from a slight change in our own cells. Therefore chemotherapy and X rays inevitably produce some damage in normal cells, too. Doctors, being only human and sharing in their patient’s pain and terror, have devised even more ferocious treatments. In our war on cancer we've stampeded ourselves into a sort of Vietnam syndrome: To destroy our foes, we're killing our friends. As Walt Kelly’s cartoon character ‘Pogo’ observed in that context, "We have met the enemy and he is us." Since regeneration can’t occur without the stimulus and control of nerves, one would expect them to exert some controlling effect on cancer. They apparently do. As far back as the 1920’s, several experimenters implanted tumors into areas with disconnected nerves. Without exception the cancer cells took root better and grew faster than where the nerves were intact. There’s abundant evidence that the state of the entire nervous system can affect cancer. Back in 1927 Elida Evans, a student of Carl Jung, documented a link between depression and cancer in a study almost totally neglected in the intervening years. In a long-term project begun in 1946 by Dr. Caroline Bedell Thomas at John Hopkins School of Medicine, students were given personality tests, and the occurrence of disease among them was charted over several decades. In this and later studies, a high risk of developing cancer has been correlated with a specific psychological profile that includes a poor relationship with parents, self-pity, self-deprecation, passivity, a compulsive need to please, and above all an inability to rise from depression after some traumatic event such as the death of a loved one or loss of a job. In such a person, cancer typically follows the loss in a year or two. Several physicians have found they can greatly increase cancer patients’ chances of a cure with biofeedback, meditation, hypnosis, or visualization techniques." The above section explains why there are practically dozens of different methods that have been successful at reversing cancer since they basically stress regaining overall health which is basically enhancing the bodies ability to regenerate. Sufficient regeneration in the body will also reform cancerous cells back into normal cells. My belief is that the more a cancer patient will do to regain health, the greater this persons chances at overcoming cancer. This also includes mental health (positive energy) which is the source of the regenerative nerve energy in the body.
|
