Summary of the clinical investigations of DC current against cancer tumors

Science magazine #130, 1959, Humphrey and Seal
Biophysical Approach Toward Tumor Regression In Mice
Mice were given implants implants of sarcoma-180. External electrodes (1" x 1.5") were placed on the skin, one on the tumor area. 3mA of direct current was applied for 4.8 houra daily for 21 days, at which time there was 60% total regression (tumor death) in all treated mice.

Medical Hypotheses (1997) 49, pg 297-300
Targeting a key enzyme in cell growth: A novel therapy for cancer

This study hypothesizes that the successes of studies of direct electrical current (DC) against cancer tumors is due to the fact that DC inhibits the RR enzyme which is necessary for cancer cell growth. The paper lists other studies with these results; 1) 60% of the treated mice had their tumors decrease/harden/drop-off using external electrodes (1x1.5") at 3mA current for 4.8 hours daily for 21 days, 2) 88% tumor destruction in hamsters using one external electrode and one implanted needle electrode at 3mA for 1 hour daily for 4 days, 3) 98% average reduction in tumor size in hamsters using one external electrode and one implanted needle electrode at 2.4mA for 1 hour daily for 5 days.

Alternative Cancer Treatment with few side effects: The Electro Carcinoma Therapy (ECT)
This is information from the German clinic which references a 30% success rate (of total tumor destruction) that the Chinese had with over 10,000 patients. An additional 40% had reduction of tumor size. They applied the DC current to platinum wire electrodes, in the form of needles, injected directly into the tumors. In contrast; the German Marburg Institute works almost exclusively with metal electrode plates applied to the skin which gives them the same results. Their treatments are for 2-3 hours for at least 2 consecutive days. They vary the current amount according to tumor size and density.

CLICK HERE for the extended versions of the above studies.

CLICK HERE for the page about our tumor electrifier, called the DC Electrifier.


In an Bioelectrochemistry article "Electrochemical Treatment of Tumors" details of the Chinese study results were listed as such:

5 year survival rates after having received ECT

Malignant tumors treated      % survival rate
skin cancer      80%
laryngeal cancer      62%
tongue or lip cancer      62%
prostate cancer      50%
lung cancer      39%
jaw +  facial tumors      39%
 
Benign tumors treated % survival rate
thyroid tumors      99%
prostate tumors      71%
thyroid carcinoma      53%
breast cancer      50%
thyroid carcinoma      53%
chest-abdominal wall metastases      43%

(These percentages are not in conflict with the 30% rate of complete tumor elimination that the article by the Marburg Institute lists because they aren't percentages of complete tumor elimination, but rather of percentages of patients still alive after 5 years.)


Click here to read about how 80 Coulombs (per square centimeter tumor size) electrical charge applied by platinum electrodes in mice with tumors had long term success, whereas lower total charge (electrical current times treatment time) was unsuccessful. Equal to 80 Coulombs is: 6mA of applied direct current for 3 hrs 42 min, 5mA for 4 hr 26 min, etc. Here is the chart showing the continued death of tumors at 80 Coulombs:

 

Effect of DEC on the growth curve of fibrosarcoma Sa-37 tumor . The experimental groups formed for the fibrosarcoma Sa-37 tumor were CG2; treated group with 36 C/cm3 , TG2-1; treated group with 63 C/cm3 , TG2-2; treated group with 80 C/cm3 , TG2-3. Each experimental group is formed by 10 mice.

Swedish professor Bjorn Nordenstrom also had success with 80C per square centimeter of tumor size in 20 patients with 26 inoperable lung tumors. 12 out of the 26 tumors (46%) had complete regression (elimination) and no signs of regrowth were detected after a 2-5 year follow-up.